Why is Trendy Triumph a trusted source? To assist you in making the perfect shoe choice, we are analyzing and reviewing the leading running shoe companies, including Hoka, Brooks, Asics, and Nike. The website's revenue from monetizing ads.
How do you compare Hoka Mach 4 vs. Rincon 3?
The Hoka Mach 4 and Rincon 3 are well-known for their versatility. Both pairs offer slow, cushioned runs up to race day. They may look similar in many ways while having a few differences.
The Mach 4 is more responsive, but the Rincon 3 is lighter. Moreover, the outsole has exposed foam in Mach 4, making it less durable than the Rincon 3.
Hoka Mach 4 vs Rincon 3: comparison of the specifications
| Parameter | Hoka Mach 4 | Hoka Rincon 3 |
| Weight | 7.8 oz. | 7.3 oz |
| Pronation | Neutral pronation, Underpronation, and supination | Neutral pronation, Underpronation, Supination |
| Cushioning | Balanced | Balanced |
| Terrain | Road | Road |
| Toe Box | Medium | Medium |
| Arch Type | High Arch | High Arch |
| Material | Mesh vegan | Mesh |
| Heel Height | 29 mm | 29 mm |
| Forefoot Height | 24 mm | 24 mm |
Hoka And Rincon: Upper
With a traditional engineered mesh upper with built-in breathability, the Mach 4 feels comfortable. The upper is more relaxed, providing excellent lockdown. Also, the upper is not thin and transparent, leaving a lightweight feel.
Jacquard mesh upper is used in the Rincon 3, making it stiff. Moreover, the footwear only stretches a little. Such a combo makes the shoe a blister magnet for people with wider feet. Even normal-width feet tend to swell up when running for long distances. However, impressive breathability makes the pair a great training partner on summer days.
Hoka Midsole Vs Rincon Midsole
Hoka designed the Mach 4 with speed in mind. So, they used upgraded PROFLY in the midsole. The material gives a cushioned landing and a propulsive toe-off. You will experience a softer and firmer feel when standing due to the dual-density foam, especially under the heel.
The Rincon 3 can handle comfortable daily rides with its responsive midsole. It is a protective shoe because of the midsole cushioning. Also, the midsole feels reactive and doesn’t provide reactive bounce. Besides, the curved design encourages people to run faster.
Outsole
Rubberized ground contact EVA foam in the Mach 4 outsole gives a lightweight feel. Hoka used flex elements in the forefoot to get maximum grip and traction. However, the rubber is thin; you may feel like running on the exposed foam. Thus, the outsole lacks durability.
The outsole of the Rincon 3 is harder than that of its competitor. It maintains a good balance between durability and traction. A few users found wear and tear in the outsole after running around 400 miles. Meaning that the footwear offers worry-free durability. Besides, the subtle tread bites asphalt or wet surfaces and lets you run at high speeds.
Cushioning
The Mach 4 features a low-profile cushion bed, keeping your feet closer to the ground. A firmer material is designed to provide an efficient push. In my opinion, this pair performs well as a half-marathon or marathon shoe for people who need a responsive feel.
Many runners appreciated the Rincon 3’s cushioning. They experienced less impact and shock when running on various terrains. The cushion absorbs impact effectively when landing. Moreover, the shoe provides a protective feel with cushioning in the most frigid runs.
Comfort
Being lightweight and nimble, the Mach 4 is comfortable enough for daily runs. Even if you push the pace on it, you will feel cozy. More softness underfoot and zero hot spots during long-time wearing allow you to wear them wherever you want. I wear them around my home, grocery shopping, and daily running.
The Rincon 3 is remarkably comfortable for its excellent breathable features. Nevertheless, it is less breathable than Mach 4 as you may get blisters from long-term wearing in the hot summer days.
Durability
As said, exposed foam in the outsole makes the Mach 4 less durable. The outsole wears down quickly. Also, there is no real rubber, causing longevity issues. I saw a few minor wear and tears after a few runs. However, the upper withstands average damage efficiently.
You will get decent durability from the Rincon 3. The upper, outsole, and midsole act together to give an average of 450 miles of durability. This pair handles daily runs effectively.
Weight
Hoka designed the Mach 4 with exposed foam in the outsole, making it lighter than its competitor. The shoe weighs 7.87 oz., which can help you during medium/fast days.
One of the key appeals of the Rincon 3 is its lightweight design. With 7.3 oz., the footwear is lighter than everyday training shoes.
Fit & Feel
The Mach 4 fits like a glove in my feet. Though I found it a bit narrow initially, it broke in perfectly after running a few miles. As a result, I felt comforted. It is manufactured for people with a bit wider feet. Also, the semi-gusseted tongue locks down the midfoot perfectly.
Rincon 3’s toe box measures 97.2 mm, making it suitable for normal or narrow-feet wearers. Also, it features a moderate-to-wide heel with a snugger midfoot and forefoot. The forefoot is a little snappy to ride faster and smoother.
Hoka Mach 4 vs. Rincon 3: Which One to Buy?
So, it is clear by now which pair to choose. I comprehensively shared the feature comparison to help you pick the correct one for your feet.
Still want my opinion?
| I Suggest You Buy Hoka Mach 4 If | I Suggest You Buy Hoka Mach 4 If |
| Preference is a solid shoe | You look for a lightweight daily trainer |
| You need a shoe for fast/medium days | Long distances Run |
| Your priority is breathability | Performs well regardless of the weather |
READ MORE
- Hoka vs Brooks: Which Shoe Brand Should You Prefer?
- Clifton 8 and 9: Feature & Design Comparison
- Bondi 8 vs. Gaviota 5: Which is Better for Amazing Support?
