Why is Trendy Triumph a trusted source? To assist you in making the perfect shoe choice, we are analyzing and reviewing the leading running shoe companies, including Hoka, Brooks, Asics, and Nike. The website's revenue from monetizing ads.
Hoka Bondi vs Clifton – Key Differences
Many people wonder, “What is the difference between Hoka Bondi vs Clifton?” The reason is that both shoes have pretty similar features, offering a smooth running experience on roads. I studied and reviewed the wearers of these shoes to identify their differences based on performance.
So, how does Clifton and Bondi differ? Clifton is the lightest shoe among all Hokas, while Bondis are heavy. Bondi is designed with maximum cushioning. Inversely, Clifton compromises cushioning to offer speed runs. Then again, Bondis are minimalist shoes for their lower heel drop. Conversely, Clifton features a higher heel drop, providing good stability.
I break down the features in more detail in this comprehensive guide so you can easily find the best fit for your stride.
Hoka Bondi vs Clifton – Comparison Chart
Both shoes have other distinctive differences. Here, I listed the specs difference between Clifton and Bondi.
| Parameter | Hoka Bondi | Hoka Clifton |
| Weight | 10.7 oz. | 8.1 oz. |
| Heel Drop | 4 mm | 5 mm |
| Pronation Type | Neutral | Neutral |
| Cushioning | Well-balanced | Plush |
| Bounce | Good | Moderate |
| Terrain | Road | Road |
| Stack Height | 42.5 mm | 40 mm |
| Stability | High | High |
| Flexibility | Rigid | Flexible |
| Size | True to Size | True to Size |
| Toe Box | Wide | Narrow |
Feature Comparison Between Hoka Bondi and Clifton
Need help deciding which Hoka series to choose? This detailed feature comparison answers all your queries.
Cushioning
Bondi has better cushioning than Clifton. Although, both are excellent neutral shoes for being well-cushioned.
Hoka uses their thick “signature foam” in Bondi. Wearers feel comfy under their feet. Also, the cushion absorbs impact effectively when running. NCBI found that cushioned shoes minimize load rates in post-fatigue conditions during landings. Users also stated that well-cushioned Bondi solved their knee problem.
Clifton features less dense foam than Bondi. However, it offers a more plush, responsive, energetic, and fast feel. Clifton will be an ideal choice if you want a more flexible ride.
Weight
The average weight of Bondi and Clifton is 10.7 oz. and 8.1 oz. respectively. Meaning that Clifton is lighter. Keep in mind that weight can vary based on the size.
Bondi is cushioned like hell, which is the prime reason for its bulkiness. Cliftons are better fits than Bondi.
In contrast, Clifton sacrifices cushioning and embraces speed. At the same time, responsiveness is high for the lightweight characteristics. For runners who prefer speed, Clifton provides the best performance.
Durability
A few factors impact shoes’ longevity, like usage, terrain, frequency, and weight.
A superior and robust build is one of the key features of Bondi. Many wearers appreciated that they ran 300-500 miles wearing Bondi.
On the other hand, Clifton is also well-known for its extreme durability. Wearers of these shoes stated that they ran on a mix of surfaces, and Clifton appears less damaged. However, a user had an issue with the Clifton insole durability, and s/he emailed Hoka about the issue. Hoka sent the wearer a pair of insoles.
Heel Drop
The difference in the heel drop is considerably noticeable between the shoes. Bondi has a 4 mm heel drop, while Clifton has a 5 mm heel drop.
Lower heel drop makes the Bondi a more minimalist shoe. You will feel more natural in the midfoot and forefoot during every stride. Most podiatrists agree that “the lower the heel drop, the more the ankle mobility and calf flexibility.”
Conversely, Clifton is best for all types of running because of its higher heel drop. Moreover, you will get more stability on a wide range of surfaces. Runners who need additional heel support must choose the Clifton series.
Responsiveness
Both shoes have a foamy midsole and offer the same level of responsiveness. However, their responsiveness could be better than other Hoka shoes.
As mentioned, Clifton is well-balanced. This series is categorized between plusness and responsiveness. Thanks to the rockered style and mix level of cushioning, providing a bit of energy return.
On the flip side, Bondi absorbs many impacts for its extreme level of cushioning. The series feels plush and comfortable when running. Nevertheless, the energy return is not as good as Clifton’s.
Sizing & Fit
Like all other Hokas, Bodi and Clifton are true to size. Still, they have differences.
I found Bondi a little roomy in the toe box. I have wider feet and can wear them without discomfort. The series is available in wide and extra-wide sizes.
Then again, Clifton is designed with a slightly narrow toe box. So, runners with narrow feet should wear them. There is an incident where a user experienced blisters in the midfoot wearing Clifton 4. The culprit was the rigid insole and longer break-in time.
Construction
Materials used in the shoes are of high quality. Thus, they are promised to deliver many years of service.
The upper mesh of the Clifton is breathable. Moreover, the CMEVA foam midsole and meta-rocker technology offer outstanding shock absorption. Furthermore, high-abrasion zones are strategically designed in the outsole to maximize coverage.
In other ways, Bondis has a sturdy upper made of engineered mesh fabric. The full EVA midsole and signature meta-rocker offer a balanced ride over any distance. Some users prefer them for city walking. Megagrip soles are also well-received by the wearers.
Hoka Bondi vs Clifton – Which One to Buy?
When selecting Bondi and Clifton, you must know what type of runner you are.
| Clifton is best for, | Bondi is best for, |
| A variety of running styles | Recovery runs, long-distance running |
| Faster tempo runs, speed plays | Wearers looking for well-cushioned and comfortable shoes |
| Runner who prioritizes lightweight construction | Excellent stability |
